AI Tracking Module for Interceptor Drones: 6 TOPS vs. 3 TOPS at Night

A71 interceptor UAV application diagram
A71 interceptor UAV tracking a small target drone in a controlled application scenario.

An interceptor only counts if it can see what it is flying at. In daylight almost any vision board holds a vehicle or aircraft in frame; after dark the same airframe is blind. We publish two AI tracking modules for that job, at 6 TOPS and 3 TOPS — not two grades of one product, but opposite sides of a weight-and-power trade.

Night changes the sensor before it changes the algorithm

A visible-light camera loses most of its usefulness once the target is unlit or silhouetted. The fix is an uncooled thermal core feeding the same board, which is why we publish infrared input on DS071 — thermal versus optical zoom covers that half of the decision.

The thermal switch does not change which spec column matters; it sharpens it. Once the target is a handful of pixels, what decides the lock is minimum trackable target size, not the NPU rating:

  • DA063HS locks from 2 × 2 px on centroid tracking and 8 × 8 px on correlation, at a minimum contrast of ≥ 3 %.
  • DS071 locks from 4 × 4 px centroid and 10 × 10 px correlation, at ≥ 5 % contrast.

Target size scales with the square of pixel count, so on identical optics a board that needs a 4 × 4 box gives up roughly half the range of one that holds a 2 × 2 box. That arithmetic — not the TOPS figure — is the real difference between these two boards at night.

The two boards side by side

DA063HS DS071
Processor Rockchip RK3588S, 8 nm, 8-core to 2.4 GHz RV1126B AI vision processor
NPU 6 TOPS 3 TOPS
Tracking frame rate 60 Hz (to 100 Hz, compatible camera) 30 Hz (to 50 Hz, compatible camera)
Min. trackable target 2 × 2 px centroid / 8 × 8 px correlation 4 × 4 px centroid / 10 × 10 px correlation
Accuracy / speed ≤ 1 px, ≥ 64 px/frame ≤ 1 px, ≥ 32 px/frame
Simultaneous targets ≤ 64 ≤ 32
Recognition 25 Hz, from 10 × 10 px, 0.616 mAP 25 Hz, from 20 × 20 px, 0.472 mAP
Camera input 2 × MIPI + USB 3.0 (digital) Visible-light and infrared, global shutter
Mass / size 24.5 g, 55 × 40 mm 20.1 g bare board, 43 × 38 mm with connector
Power / supply < 6 W, 12 V DC ± 2 V < 4 W, 12 V DC ± 2 V
Operating / storage −20 to +60 °C / −20 to +65 °C −40 to +65 °C / −55 to +75 °C
Onboard storage 32 GB, ≥ 2 h at 4 Mbps 8 GB, ≥ 1 h at 4 Mbps
Output & control RTSP / UDP / RTMP / HLS, RS422 / RS232 / UDP / TCP Network + CVBS, OSD overlay, miss-distance output, same control set

6 TOPS: DA063HS when the mission is many targets

The RK3588S platform is why this board holds sixty-four tracks at once and still recognises what it is tracking from a 10 × 10 px footprint, at a published 0.616 mAP on the VisDrone2019 test set (IoU 0.5) — an open-dataset figure, which is what makes it comparable with a competitor's.

Where it earns its 6 W and 24.5 g: airborne pods, fixed sentry posts, border and coastal sections — any perimeter job where several contacts must stay in frame and the airframe is not mass-limited. The 32 GB onboard memory, roughly two hours at 4 Mbps, is the other reason integrators pick this tier: the footage survives the link. Both boards support secondary development.

3 TOPS: DS071 when every gram is counted

DS071 is the board we put on interceptor-class airframes. At 20.1 g bare board and under 4 W it is a payload decision you can defend on an 800 g aircraft, and −40 to +65 °C operating with −55 to +75 °C storage covers the box it lives in between sorties as well as the flight. The trade is in the table above: half the compute, half the track count, a larger minimum target. Against one fast contact in a narrow field of view that is usually the right trade, because the limiter is optics and airframe energy, not the NPU.

Watch the DS071 holding a drone target on an interceptor airframe:

For the airframe side of that clip, our A71 interceptor is an 800 g, 420 km/h class platform with a 6 TOPS processor onboard; on that aircraft the board's mass is a mission parameter, not a footnote. The counter-drone line has the rest.

What to feed the board

A tracking module is only as good as the picture it is handed. The pairing we specify most often for night work is a 9 mm uncooled core at 50 FPS, 640 × 512 or 384 × 288 detector resolution — a reference for sizing your own optical chain, not a part we sell. Settle two things before choosing the board:

  1. Output format. DA063HS publishes digital inputs only; DS071 states visible-light and infrared input.
  2. Pixel budget, not megapixels. Work backwards from lock range, target size and detector pitch, then check the answer against the table.

Mass, mounting and power across the whole set are in the payload compatibility checklist.

How to choose, and what it costs

  • Multiple contacts, or recording you must keep? DA063HS — 64 tracks, 32 GB, ≥ 2 h.
  • Hand-launched or expendable airframe under 1 kg? DS071 — 20.1 g, < 4 W, cold-soak rated.
  • Night or unlit targets? Settle the thermal core first, then check its output format against the board's inputs before comparing TOPS.
  • Long dwell on a very small target? The 2 × 2 px centroid floor on DA063HS is the deciding number.
  • Ground software already written? Both expose RTSP/UDP/RTMP/HLS and RS422/RS232/UDP/TCP, so the switch is mechanical rather than architectural.

Both list at sample pricing — DA063HS at $1,400, DS071 at $969 — with bulk pricing on request, since installed cost depends on how many airframes you are fitting. Send the camera interface, the range at which you must lock, the mass you can carry and the destination country, and the enquiry comes back naming one board rather than both. Export authorisation and import legality in the destination country remain the buyer's responsibility; we supply the documentation you need to file them.

Newer postWildfire Patrol from the Sky: AT-G18Y VTOL UAV and MT11 Multi-Sensor Payload Older postCOFDM vs. IP vs. Mesh Video Data Links: Which Fits Your Mission

Frequently asked questions

Can the 6 TOPS board take a thermal camera?

Its published interface list is two MIPI channels plus USB 3.0, all digital, and its product page carries no separate thermal-input claim. A thermal core with a digital MIPI output is the normal route — confirm the core's output format with us before you commit the mount. If you want infrared input stated on the page rather than inferred from the connector, DS071 is the board that publishes visible-light and infrared input.

Is 3 TOPS enough to counter a drone?

For holding one target in a narrow field of view, yes: 30 Hz tracking with up to 50 Hz on a compatible camera, centroid lock from 4 × 4 pixels, up to 32 simultaneous tracks and 0.472 mAP on the VisDrone2019 test set. What the extra 3 TOPS buys is a smaller lockable target, twice the track count and a higher frame ceiling — which matters more for perimeter and swarm monitoring than for a one-versus-one intercept.

What decides lock range — compute or the camera?

The optics decide first. Focal length and detector pitch set how many pixels a target of a given physical size occupies at a given distance; the board then decides whether it can still lock at that pixel count. That is why minimum trackable target size, not TOPS, is the number worth comparing between vendors.

Working on a requirement like this one? Send us the mission — payload, endurance and the terrain — and we will say which platform fits and which does not.

Send inquiry